Related topics

AAHHHHHHHH !! Intergraph.
They have also gotten well into MPEG phase II, whose task is to define a bitstream for video and audio coded at around 3 to 10 Mbits/s. ...... A. MPEG-4 targets the Very Low Bitrate applications defined loosly as having sampling dimensions up to 176 x 144 x 10 Hz and coded bit rates between 4800 and 64000 bits/sec.

OpenGL mini drivers?
Subjects, by order of presentation: 1- Final drivers: 2- Beta drivers: 3- Web sites (official) 4- Web sites (unofficial) related 5- Driver story 6- DMA ...... So I guess my board is out of warrenty, and I may risk shorting the life of my hardware, but it beats not having the product work at all( lesser of two evils

XPERT 2000 and Win2K
I've tried 2 official and 2 beta drivers from ATI and Rage3d.com website. Each time I run the executable, it just tells me that I have the wrong (VGA)card for the Since I am having problems getting my Visiontek GeForce2 AGP card working with my 503+, and nobody has said anything about it being incompatible,

Athlon clobbers G4 in Spec95 (was Re: Jobs RDF at work again:
No help from Microsoft, ATI drivers are useless and no one can offer a clear answer - is it video card? Is it motherboard? Is it my hyper-threading Prescott P4 3Hz CPU? "Test0r" wrote: Come on I know there are others having issues getting their ATI Vista 2 Beta drivers installed properly, I can't be the only one.

XPERT 2000 and Win2K
Peter nob...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows vista hardware_devices Why are you using beta drivers, when the regular drivers are available for download for Vista x86 and x64? http://ati.amd.com/support/driver.html I used both those cards with no problem in Vista x86, but have since switched to

I would choose Nvidia 6800 over Ati X800
Can you imagine paying $500 for an ATI video card and not having stable operating system because of flaws in the video card driver? What reliablity issues? Nobody is perfect. People with Nvidia cards have failures, driver issues and incompatibilties as well. So your point about video drivers is bunk.

Diamond horrible OS/2 support...moving to ATI
For the first six months everything was fine, well, if you call having way too much trouble getting the drivers to install fine. I don't know if they have OS/2 drivers for their addon card but they aren't using Win95 beta drivers, they are working on NT drivers and it didn't cost anything near what I've spent.

Why are there so many nvidia drivers released, so often ?
For example, the Stealth24's most current Win3.11 driver (posted close to two years ago) is beta implying that Diamond is aware that there are still problems with the driver. If you look into it, you'll find that many people who are still using Win3.11 with a Diamond card still are having problems that continue to

About to Get Rage Fury -- How is the DVD Playback Quality?
So I call again, the next day and I get "Well I have these new beta drivers (2070) that should work." After putting them in at least the machine works but I still have the "swimming" Because nobody will admit it's their fault. It just seems funny that all of the rush cards seem to be having similar problems.

ATI has bad drivers? HAH!
Running beta drivers is chance-taking, sure. I'll agree to that. However, what made you think I was "whining"? I was stating facts, nothing else. You probably got an SDRAM 845 P4, didn't ya...hehe So much for not having a clue. Rotfl. Of course Norwood is what we all really need...hehe You're not very bright

Dual Processsor Support WILL NEVER COME with SBLive.
I too have played several movies and music video titles on my Rage Fury with DVD 3.1 and I also use ATI-TV Wonder and love it too! My advice for a proper driver to use on your Rage Fury to get good results with DVD, TV, and 3D games is to use the Lightspeed 2000 BETA driver from www.lightspeed2000.com.

That's right nVidia...kick 'em while they're down..hehe
I've been having trouble with my new XPERT 2000 running underwindows 2000. It locks up once or twice a day for no apparent reason. I assumed it was the beta drivers I had gotten from the ATI site and lived with it. However, I just tried installing a fresh copy of Windows 2000 and ran into blue screens and A screen

THE MPEG-FAQ [Version 3.0]
Steve said, I too, am having the same problem. I remember how hard it was to get the update from MMC6.0 to 6.2 from ATI. The thread started out asking about experiences with the Win2K beta drivers. Then it went right to a the lack of the very important 352 capture size and other VCD issues.

Window 2000 MMC - VERY Long
And maybe if you would give out beta drivers.... you wouldn't be having such horrible problems with such CPU configurations to begin with. With whatever time is left (which there will be probably will VERY LITTLE time left by this point)-- you can put work into the stupid junk that nobody uses... like Keytar,

Diamond horrible OS/2 support...moving to ATI
Nobody nobody_of_conseque...@email.msn.com alt comp periphs videocards matrox Be glad that Matrox even tries to support older cards like the g400 in newer operating systems. ATI simply abandons their older cards (ie Rage Fury Max) Some companies like HP charges you for driver upgrades. The G400 was designed when

NOBODY having problems with ATI beta drivers?
Fool Name nob...@home.now comp os os2 multimedia I bought a Diamond Stealth 64 Video VRam 3240 almost a year ago (before they were even available in the retail channels). For the first six months everything was fine, well, if you call having way too much trouble getting the drivers to install fine.

List of 503+ Compatible/Incompatible Video Cards
Nobody who matters is actually creating games for OpenGL's "platforms". We don't CARE if it runs on Linux! It really is that simple. Would *you* trust an server-class OS which was running unsupported beta drivers? My fast software comment was just there to hedge against some moron thinking there was some gap

MATROX IS BEING LEFT IN THE DUST!!!!!!!!!!
For the first six months everything was fine, well, if you call having way too much trouble getting the drivers to install fine. This card accepts an addon card (for $299 and $399 depending on how much Vram is on it), but the only drivers for it are Win3.x drivers (oh, they just released some BETA Win95 drivers for

Diamond horrible OS/2 support...moving to ATI
Is this an interaction with ) the ATI GUP's imperfect 8514/a emulation? Unless I'm mistaken, the 8514 drivers are in their very first beta. I'm sure they are working on it (unless nobody bothered to report the problem). A problem like this couldn't help but be reported. The fact that drivers so buggy are

Was going to buy Diamond, but...
I don't understand why you think that having the "option" of using newer, beta drivers is a bad thing when you can always go back to earlier drivers. .... Personally I like the leaks, I'm using the 10.80s at the moment and I find them to be performing quite well. I'd be sad to see them go, but I totally understand